The Dark Knight

Finally a comic book movie that lives up to the height. This movie had EVERYTHING, from romance, action, even horror (that joker is a scarey guy) I found myself crying at the end because Heath Ledger was dead, and there will be no one ever to replace his Joker performance. Man this movie was excellent from start to finish, best comic book movie by FAR!!!

It was great, i agree with you on the best comic book movie ever. Heck this movie made Iron Man seem boring.

I was one of those people who went to go see it just cause heath ledger was gone, this style of acting was really different from all his other movies, i thought he did a really good job in it. Even though im not a comic book fan, and i dont know anything about Batman i still say Heath Ledger was the perfect Joker.

this movie was way overrated and alot of it made on since. this movie suked **** and no offense but ledger will always be a **** after broke back mountain. how da hell did joker no exactly where to put his people to tangle up the helicopter? SO ****!

wow someone is a bit rude, but you should expect comments like that when you let kid onto the computers.

There was so much going on, it was amazing how they were able to keep a decent plot with so much going on. Overall it was a decent movie.

wallyworld wrote:

There was so much going on, it was amazing how they were able to keep a decent plot with so much going on. Overall it was a decent movie.

I agree with that. There was alot going on

Dark Knight was a great movie, but i also think it was to long. I would say it was just as good as Iron Man.

Man, i dont see how anyone couldnt like this movie. I've seen it 3 times so far, and once in IMAX. This was one of the best movies i've seen, since The Godfather.

I dont see the big deal about it, my boyfriend ftold me this movie was going to be awesome, he was hyping it up like it was everything, and at the end i thought it sucked and it was weird. But i dont really like those types of movies anyway.

KerriWasHere! wrote:

I dont see the big deal about it, my boyfriend ftold me this movie was going to be awesome, he was hyping it up like it was everything, and at the end i thought it sucked and it was weird. But i dont really like those types of movies anyway.

WHAT!?!?!?!

Your about to make me cry. This movie doesnt have a type. It has everything, its like illegal to hate this movie.

I liked Iron man a bit more, Bale didnt even seem like the main character in this one, instead of The Dark Knight, they should have called it The Joker, but still are decent movie.

I enjoyed this movie, good actors and actresses in it, and a good director. Way better than the 1st Batman Begins, plus i was glad they got rid of Katie Holmes, she is an horrible actress.

I dont know if replacing Katie for Maggie was such a good idea. She looked so much older, it seemed in The Dark Knight Rachel (Maggie Gylenhaal) aged alot while everyone else stayed the same.

Katie Holmes looks way better than Maggie, but maggie is a better actress by far. But either way The Dark Knight would have still came out great. And i also agree with alien that Christian Bale wasnt the big star in this movie, he was almost silent in this movie.

This topic is on fire, going to be a popular topic soon.

Back to the subject now:

Katie holmes is a good actress, and i dont think that you should swap actors or actress's and a series of movies, viewers connect the the actors and then you have to reconnect if someone new is brought in.

The people who say that this movie was to long propably didnt have the brain capacity to take in all the movie, everything in this movie had to be in there,if they tooked out one part the whole movie would've been ruined.

Internet Bum wrote:

The people who say that this movie was to long propably didnt have the brain capacity to take in all the movie, everything in this movie had to be in there,if they tooked out one part the whole movie would've been ruined.

Let me get this straight ur an internet bum, but you callin every1 else stupid hmm...

I can see how people will say it was to long, but if you really watch it every part had a meaning.

Internet Bum wrote:

The people who say that this movie was to long propably didnt have the brain capacity to take in all the movie, everything in this movie had to be in there,if they tooked out one part the whole movie would've been ruined.

thanks for your compliment.

I havent even seen it yet, dont think i will until it comes out on TV. Just not my type of movie, i'm going to take heat for this post.

I agree with you Xe but people like internet are going to talk about you.

Internet Bum wrote:

The people who say that this movie was to long propably didnt have the brain capacity to take in all the movie, everything in this movie had to be in there,if they tooked out one part the whole movie would've been ruined.

So basically ur saying that if you didnt like this movie your an idiot?

WhOa! wrote:

I enjoyed this movie, good actors and actresses in it, and a good director. Way better than the 1st Batman Begins, plus i was glad they got rid of Katie Holmes, she is an horrible actress.

Maggie is like a B lister compared to katie though, Katie did good in Batman Begins

I love Katie Holmes she is very talented. I was dissapointed when i found out she wasnt goin to be in TDK